Federal prosecutor, alleging political interference in Stone case


Zelinsky additionally named Alessio Evangelista, then the primary assistant U.S. lawyer for Washington D.C., as a participant in these discussions.

Those names, which Zelinsky revealed below questioning from the Judiciary Committee’s high Republican, Rep. JIm Jordan (R-Ohio), present avenues for potential additional inquiry because the panel considers allegations that Attorney General Barr or his senior management weighed in on issues to guard the president or his allies.

Zelinsky’s testimony adopted an explosive written assertion in which he described intense strain for the 4 Stone prosecutors to deviate from DOJ follow and advocate a lighter sentence for Stone. He stated he was warned his job may very well be in jeopardy if he did not bend, and the 4 prosecutors withdrew from the case after they submitted a stiff sentence advice and had been overruled by DOJ leaders.

Zelinsky, a member of particular counsel Robert Mueller’s staff, confronted sharp assaults from committee Republicans, a few of whom accused the Mueller staff of political bias — a cost Zelinsky sharply rejected. Jordan dismissed Zelinsky’s allegations, noting that he by no means instantly spoke to Barr or different high DOJ officers in regards to the effort to revise Stone’s sentence and solely heard in regards to the political concerns by others in the division.

That argument echoed the protection put forth by the Justice Department, which has stated Zelinsky’s claims amounted to “rumour.”

The listening to, which additionally featured testimony from John Elias, an antitrust prosecutor, featured a return to sharp infighting amongst Republicans and Democrats after weeks of extra muted exchanges amid consideration of police reform laws and emotional testimony about police brutality.

As the listening to started, Barr himself agreed to testify earlier than the House Judiciary Committee subsequent month, ending — for now — a risk by Chairman Jerry Nadler to difficulty a subpoena for his testimony.

“The Attorney General has accepted an invite to look earlier than the House Judiciary Committee for a basic oversight listening to on July 28th,” Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec stated on Twitter, a day after Nadler issued his subpoena risk.

Barr’s look, if it holds, could be his first earlier than the Judiciary Committee since his affirmation early final yr.

Three earlier makes an attempt to deliver him in had been aborted. The first, in spring 2019, was canceled after Barr refused to undergo questioning from committee employees, in the weeks after he launched the report of particular counsel Robert Mueller. The second occurred in March, when the coronavirus disaster led the House to name off most committee proceedings. The listening to was rescheduled for early June, however Barr once more canceled after the White House objected, citing a prohibition on congressional testimony through the coronavirus emergency.

Committee aides stated Barr’s settlement to look got here shortly after Nadler reversed himself and began the process for issuing a subpoena for Barr’s testimony subsequent week. Nadler had beforehand rejected the prospect of subpoenaing Barr, worrying that it might result in months of litigation.


To Top